Three layers of predictive maintenance - New horizons in a world of AI and Big Data

The key difference between preventive maintenance and predictive maintenance is that the latter means completing maintenance only when needed, as opposed to scheduled intervals. With Industry 4.0, manufacturing data will allow us to gradually replace preventive maintenance with predictive maintenance, but can we go further than this? Here, Miron Shtiglitz, VP for Product and Delivery at quality inspection specialist QualiSense, forecasts a future where data from inspection not only underpins maintenance schedules, but informs the very design of the product itself.

Anyone familiar with Industry 4.0 has likely encountered the concept of predictive maintenance. By harnessing the data from machine sensors, we can more accurately predict when maintenance activity is actually required, rather than preserving with the fixed schedules typical of preventive maintenance. Optimising maintenance schedules this way means reduced labor and material costs, or so the theory goes.

Many companies are making great strides in this field and we are more accurately predicting machine health. In my home country of Israel, Augury is a good example of a company working in this area. You build a sensor that is attached to a machine, it collects data on parameters like sound and vibration and uses this data to predict when you need to carry out maintenance.

We have also seen some companies try to do this with cars. By listening to the noises the car makes, you can potentially determine what fault is likely to occur and take preventive action before it is too late.

 

Level two and three

The data gathered from inspection systems could form an additional layer to this approach. With AI, the data gathered from these intelligent inspection systems could be correlated with data from predictive maintenance technologies.

For example, we might find correlations between the quality of a product and the last time scheduled maintenance activity was performed. In order to make this approach viable, you need very large volumes of data. However, as we enter the era of Big Data, this additional layer opens new possibilities.

Looking slightly further ahead, the data gathered from quality inspection systems and the software that supports them will not only enhance the power of predictive maintenance, it will shape the design of the product itself. By using data to make the correct decisions during the design phase, we can reduce the risk of defects further along.

Imagine, for example, you are able to analyse correlations between the 3D structure of a part, the processes that take place during its manufacture, and the potential for certain defects to result in this scenario. Using this, you can help the mechanical designer make optimal decisions based on the data.

The data could also help design engineers explore different options and their suitability. For example, let’s say an engineer wants to design a part that is thinner in a specific area and use a specific material for this purpose. Using data from other inspected parts, you might extrapolate that using material x at this particular level of thickness leads to an increased incidence of defects, or using a particular process in combination with this material makes it more prone to break.

Although further away, this is a possibility that engineers and AI specialists are already talking about. It is sometimes referred to as the ‘expert system’ and is similar to the Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) that you read about in media headlines.

As we move beyond the first level of predictive maintenance toward multi-sensor approaches, the world of Big Data will open exciting possibilities. However, this next step is not the final chapter in the story. While we keep one foot planted in the present, we can still imagine a future where intelligent systems not only harness data to optimise maintenance activity, but are capable of fundamentally reshaping the manufacture of the product itself.

 

QualiSense is an award-winning AI start-up developing software for the machine vision market. To discover more about QualiSense solutions for complex visual inspection application, visit qualisense.ai

 

Comments (0)

This post does not have any comments. Be the first to leave a comment below.


Post A Comment

You must be logged in before you can post a comment. Login now.

Featured Product

T.J. Davies' Retention Knobs

T.J. Davies' Retention Knobs

Our retention knobs are manufactured above international standards or to machine builder specifications. Retention knobs are manufactured utilizing AMS-6274/AISI-8620 alloy steel drawn in the United States. Threads are single-pointed on our lathes while manufacturing all other retention knob features to ensure high concentricity. Our process ensures that our threads are balanced (lead in/lead out at 180 degrees.) Each retention knob is carburized (hardened) to 58-62HRC, and case depth is .020-.030. Core hardness 40HRC. Each retention knob is coated utilizing a hot black oxide coating to military specifications. Our retention knobs are 100% covered in black oxide to prevent rust. All retention knob surfaces (not just mating surfaces) have a precision finish of 32 RMA micro or better: ISO grade 6N. Each retention knob is magnetic particle tested and tested at 2.5 times the pulling force of the drawbar. Certifications are maintained for each step in the manufacturing process for traceability.